![]() Sovereignty DefinedĪlthough understandings of sovereignty have evolved over time, the earliest and most traditional definition asserts that states have the freedom to govern themselves as they choose, with full control over their internal and external affairs and free from interference or intervention (Glanville 2014, 2). To tackle this thorny subject, we will discuss different elements of classical and modern definitions of sovereignty as they apply to the recent history of U.S.-Cuba relations: traditional state sovereignty, economic sovereignty, territorial sovereignty, and popular sovereignty. Developing a mutual understanding and respect for where each other stands on this concept will support the next stage of closer relations and consolidate this pivotal shift towards normalization. ![]() In an effort to help these two nations live out their differences in peace while also finding new opportunities for dialogue and cooperation, it is useful to examine areas where they may agree on the concept of sovereignty as well as where they disagree. Yet the two states understand the critical concept of sovereignty very differently, or at least emphasize different aspects of it, and have lived it in asymmetrical ways. This is not merely a theoretical or rhetorical issue: it goes to the heart of Cuba’s longstanding quest for true independence. ![]() After an extended period of hostilities and antagonism, D17 opened a new, more positive chapter in the way these two countries relate to one another as sovereign nations. The December 17, 2014, announcements by Presidents Barack Obama and Raúl Castro that the United States and Cuba had agreed to reestablish diplomatic relations (known as D17) was a watershed moment in U.S.-Cuba relations. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |